loading
0%

Hello-Site.ru. Бесплатный конструктор сайтов.

Grow together, stand together! Support Ukraine here!

2016 → 2026 → 2036: from 'Can the ERP do this?' to 'Just make it happen'

Mar 10, 2026
30

If you worked with the Microsoft Dynamics NAV ecosystem around 2016, you probably remember a certain weight that came with ERP projects. NAV was powerful, stable, and endlessly customizable  but it often felt like a system you had to adapt your business around, or pay to adapt the system to your needs.

Today, Dynamics 365 Business Central looks like a different product entirely: cloud-based, modular, API-oriented, easier to update, and increasingly AI-assisted.

And if you follow that trajectory another decade forward, the direction is clear: ERP  won't disappear, but the amount of manual work surrounding it will keep shrinking. People will spend less time executing processes and more time making decisions.

Let’s walk the timeline.

2016 – Customize everything, pay the upgrade tax

In Microsoft Dynamics NAV, you could do almost anything. If standard functionality fell short, a developer walked into the base application and changed what needed changing. Full control. Full flexibility. And full ownership of whatever came out the other end.

Consider a seemingly simple request: a customer wants to increase the Item Description field length from 50 to 150 characters. On paper, trivial. In NAV reality, it often turned into a serious effort. You couldn't just change the field in the Item table  you had to follow it through Item Ledger Entry, Item Journal Line, Sales Line, Purchase Line, and more. Then review where it flows through posting routines to make sure nothing breaks. Then check reports and document layouts where the description is printed, filtered, or used in calculations. What started as "make the field longer" became an audit of a wide portion of item-related processes.

That developer had enormous power  but it came with a predictable bill that arrived during upgrades. When a new version of NAV was released, you had to manually compare Microsoft's updated standard objects against your modified ones, resolve conflicts, re-apply deltas, and re-test everything touched by schema and logic changes. An upgrade of customization like the one above could cost 20–30% of the original development budget just to carry forward  sometimes more.

And when companies moved from NAV to Business Central, deep base-application changes often couldn't be migrated at all. They had to be redesigned from scratch to fit the new model: extensions, events, APIs. You didn't upgrade the change – you rebuilt it in a more maintainable way.

This dynamic shaped how people worked. Several things that were considered normal in 2016 look obviously wrong in hindsight: treating customization as the default answer rather than the last resort; large go-lives that tried to deliver everything at once; upgrade cycles that got postponed for years because the risk was too high; and integrations — with e-commerce platforms, banks, CRMs — treated as one-off engineering projects instead of repeatable patterns.

With complex processes and a UI that was not always user-friendly, Excel quietly became the second UI of every ERP. Data cleanup happened in Excel. Budgets lived in Excel. Operational reports were built in Excel. The ERP held the truth; Excel delivered the comfort.

2026 – Extend fast, stay standard, scale in the cloud 

With Business Central, the development philosophy shifted in a practical and consequential way: from modifying the product to extending it and from hosting and maintaining infrastructure yourself to consuming it as a service. The architecture reflects this. Extensions encapsulate changes and keep a clean separation between Microsoft's base application and what partners or customers build on top.

Upgrade paths became predictable again, because you're no longer touching core tables and code.

Many changes that used to take months in 2016 can now be delivered faster. Take barcodes – a genuinely common requirement: invoices, picking lists, shipment notes all need them. In the NAV era, this meant starting from scratch. You had to figure out a barcode generation approach, render it inside reports, hunt down the right fonts or find an external DLL, then adapt it to your specific setup. It wasn't just "add a barcode" – it was research, technical experimentation, deployment headaches, and long-term ownership of a custom solution nobody else maintained.

In 2026, the story is usually much shorter. You go to AppSource, find a barcode app that already works with Business Central reporting, install it, configure the barcode type and placement, and you're done. No weeks of research. No custom development. Updates and compatibility are handled as part of the app's lifecycle.

This is the shift in a nutshell: what used to require building from scratch now usually means finding, installing, and configuring something that already exists. Custom development still has its place, but it's no longer the first answer.

The move to SaaS also took a lot of "ERP gravity" off businesses in other ways: predictable updates without upgrade projects, faster rollout of new capabilities, easier scaling, simpler environments. The system can evolve continuously instead of being rebuilt every few years.

Automation changed too. In 2016, the question was: can the ERP do this? In 2026, it looks more like a stack  Business Central configuration, Power Automate flows, Power Apps experiences, API integrations  and the real question becomes: where should this automation live for the lowest maintenance and the best ROI?

AI fits naturally into this layer. Copilot in Business Central helps teams draft and summarize information, surface anomalies, suggest next actions, and find answers through natural language. The practical result is faster processing, fewer manual errors, and smoother collaboration  with humans staying in control of approvals and exceptions.

2036 – Intent drives execution, ERP runs in the background 

This part is less about predicting specific features and more about following the trajectory to its logical end.

The core ERP workflows will remain. But the human busywork wrapped around them  data entry, matching, coding, routine approvals  will keep shrinking. The role of the person in the process shifts: less doing, more deciding.

The most likely candidates for automation in the next decade: routine document capture and coding (invoices, expenses, purchase orders), matching and reconciliation, basic order intake and validation, low-risk approvals where policy is clear, and first drafts of financial narratives  variance explanations, management commentary.

AI agents will handle these steps end-to-end, escalating to humans only when something falls outside the expected pattern or requires judgment.

The way data enters the system will change too. Today, most ERP data starts with a person typing something. In 2036, employees will create and receive information across many channels  email, chat, voice calls, documents  and the platform will capture, structure, and route that data into Business Central automatically.

Hardware will play a role as well: microphones and speech recognition for hands-free operations, cameras for receiving and quality checks, IoT devices for real-time warehouse execution. The gap between physical reality and structured ERP data keeps closing.

Picture a simple scenario: an employee takes a customer call about products. The system automatically creates a Sales Order in Business Central, checks item availability, generates a Purchase Order or Production Order if stock is insufficient, and schedules delivery. The employee focuses on the conversation. The system handles the mechanics. The employee reviews and approves the key actions afterward.

ERP becomes infrastructure  essential but largely invisible, embedded into the tools people already use every day.

Development will shift in a similar direction. Instead of writing detailed technical specifications, teams will describe business needs and review the solution the platform proposes. The functional consultant evolves into something closer to a business architect and governance gatekeeper  less focused on building logic, more focused on defining outcomes, maintaining data integrity, and managing what the automation is allowed to do.

That last point matters more than it might seem. When integration and automation become the default, a new layer of complexity emerges: who can automate what, and with which controls? How do you maintain data lineage and auditability across many connected tools? What happens when two automated processes conflict? How do you manage AI risk  hallucinations, bias, traceability? These aren't edge cases. They become core architectural questions.

Security investment will grow significantly. Controlling access across many tools, securing data in transit and at rest, enforcing identity and permissions consistently this moves from IT checkbox to one of the main pillars of how the ecosystem is designed.

Conclusion: ERP didn't get lighter – it got more composable 

In 2016, ERP felt heavy because it carried everything inside one box: logic, UI, reporting, and integrations. You owned all of it, and you paid for that ownership every time something needed to change.

In 2026, Business Central is closer to a core platform designed to connect, extend, and evolve. The shift to extensions, APIs, cloud updates, Power Platform, and Copilot isn't a collection of random features it's a consistent direction toward using the full power of the Microsoft business platform, with less friction at every step.

By 2036, the companies that win will be the ones with well-defined business processes, a well-built ecosystem, and the ability to turn intent into execution faster than anyone else. Not because they have the biggest ERP implementation  but because they've made the ERP the least visible part of how they work.



Do you happen to have any knowledge about  Xpand?

Xpand is a product and service software development company with over 15 years of market experience and a Microsoft Partner since 2016, assisting organizations worldwide in managing their Microsoft Dynamics ERP systems. We provide a broad range of services for clients and partners, including implementation and development for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, as well as upgrade from earlier versions like Navision Financials 2.0. Learn more about our services at https://www.xpandsoftware.com/services.

30